We’ve received much criticism over the years about our Media Bias Chart® and the placement of particular news sources within it. That’s OK; we welcome your comments on our work. But some of our most vocal critics have expressed disbelief that our politically diverse team can actually reach a consensus on the bias and reliability ratings of particular sources, especially hyper-polarizing news content. What these critics don’t understand is that our analysts don’t have to agree on the issues to do this work. It’s not their job to agree whether, for example, abortion restrictions are good, if George Santos should be expelled from Congress, or whether the U.S. should approve more funding for Ukraine. Their job is to agree whether particular articles or episodes about these issues are unbiased and reliable. Our analysts analyze; they don’t advocate. Our work is founded on the belief that individuals with varying political views can collaborate effectively. Click here to read more about our commitment to diversity of thought and how our analysts try to resolve disagreements through discussion. |
Comments
Post a Comment